Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evolution of parasitism genes in the plant parasitic nematodes.

Mehmet Dayi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet DayiForestry Vocational School, Düzce University, Konuralp Campus, 81620, Düzce, Turkey. mehmetdayi@duzce.edu.tr.
Düzce Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant-parasitic nematodes are considered as one of the most destructive pests, from which the migratory and sedentary endoparasitic plant parasitic nematodes infect more than 4000 plant species and cause over $100 billion crop losses annually worldwide. These nematodes use multiple strategies to infect their host and to establish a successful parasitism inside the host such as cell-wall degradation enzymes, inhibition of host defense proteins, and molecular mimicry. In the present study, the main parasitism-associated gene families were identified and compared between the migratory and sedentary endoparasitic nematodes. The results showed that the migratory and sedentary endoparasitic nematodes share a core conserved parasitism mechanism established throughout the evolution of parasitism. However, genes involved in pectin degradation and hydrolase activity are rapidly evolving in the migratory endoparasitic nematodes. Additionally, cell-wall degrading enzymes such as GH45 cellulases and pectate lyase and peptidase and peptidase inhibitors were expanded in the migratory endoparasitic nematodes. The molecular mimicry mechanism was another key finding that differs between the endoparasitic and sedentary parasitic nematodes. The PL22 gene family, which is believed to play a significant role in the molecular mechanisms of nematode parasitism, has been found to be present exclusively in migratory endoparasitic nematodes. Phylogenetic analysis has suggested that it was de novo born in these nematodes. This discovery sheds new light on the molecular evolution of these parasites and has significant implications for our understanding of their biology and pathogenicity. This study contributes to our understanding of core parasitism mechanisms conserved throughout the nematodes and provides unique clues on the evolution of parasitism and the direction shaped by the host.

Indexed as

ParasitesTylenchidaTylenchoideaAnimalsPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlants

Identifiers

PMID38355886
PMCPMC10866927
OpenAlexW4391813101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.