Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355824›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2024

Objective clinical registration of tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity during awake stereotactic neurosurgery: a scoping review.

Annemarie Smid, Zeus T Dominguez-Vega, Teus van Laar, D L Marinus Oterdoom, Anthony R Absalom, Martje E van Egmond, Gea Drost, J Marc C van Dijk

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annemarie SmidDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands. a.smid01@umcg.nl.
Zeus T Dominguez-VegaDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Teus van LaarDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
D L Marinus OterdoomDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Anthony R AbsalomDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Martje E van EgmondDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Gea DrostDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
J Marc C van DijkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 HPC AB71, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity are incapacitating motor symptoms that can be suppressed with stereotactic neurosurgical treatment like deep brain stimulation (DBS) and ablative surgery (e.g., thalamotomy, pallidotomy). Traditionally, clinicians rely on clinical rating scales for intraoperative evaluation of these motor symptoms during awake stereotactic neurosurgery. However, these clinical scales have a relatively high inter-rater variability and rely on experienced raters. Therefore, objective registration (e.g., using movement sensors) is a reasonable extension for intraoperative assessment of tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. The main goal of this scoping review is to provide an overview of electronic motor measurements during awake stereotactic neurosurgery. The protocol was based on the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. After a systematic database search (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science), articles were screened for relevance. Hundred-and-three articles were subject to detailed screening. Key clinical and technical information was extracted. The inclusion criteria encompassed use of electronic motor measurements during stereotactic neurosurgery performed under local anesthesia. Twenty-three articles were included. These studies had various objectives, including correlating sensor-based outcome measures to clinical scores, identifying optimal DBS electrode positions, and translating clinical assessments to objective assessments. The studies were highly heterogeneous in device choice, sensor location, measurement protocol, design, outcome measures, and data analysis. This review shows that intraoperative quantification of motor symptoms is still limited by variable signal analysis techniques and lacking standardized measurement protocols. However, electronic motor measurements can complement visual evaluations and provide objective confirmation of correct placement of the DBS electrode and/or lesioning. On the long term, this might benefit patient outcomes and provide reliable outcome measures in scientific research.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationNeurosurgical ProceduresHumansHypokinesiaTreatment OutcomeTremorWakefulnessAccelerometryEMGIMUIntraoperative monitoringMotor symptomsOptical measurements

Identifiers

PMID38355824
PMCPMC10866747
OpenAlexW4391806334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.