Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The Temozolomide-Doxorubicin paradox in Glioblastoma in vitro-in silico preclinical drug-screening.

Mariam-Eleni Oraiopoulou, Eleftheria Tzamali, Stylianos E Psycharakis, Georgios Tzedakis, Takis Makatounakis, Katina Manolitsi, Elias Drakos, Antonis F Vakis, Giannis Zacharakis, Joseph Papamatheakis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariam-Eleni OraiopoulouInstitute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Eleftheria TzamaliInstitute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Stylianos E PsycharakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser (IESL), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Georgios TzedakisInstitute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Takis MakatounakisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Katina ManolitsiUniversity General Hospital of Heraklion (PAGNI), Heraklion, Greece.
Elias DrakosSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Antonis F VakisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Giannis ZacharakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser (IESL), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Joseph PapamatheakisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece.
Vangelis SakkalisInstitute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece. sakkalis@ics.forth.gr.
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GRUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

European Regional Development Fund MIS5002755Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation 130178/I2/31-7-2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant Temozolomide is considered the front-line Glioblastoma chemotherapeutic treatment; yet not all patients respond. Latest trends in clinical trials usually refer to Doxorubicin; yet it can lead to severe side-effects if administered in high doses. While Glioblastoma prognosis remains poor, little is known about the combination of the two chemotherapeutics. Patient-derived spheroids were generated and treated with a range of Temozolomide/Doxorubicin concentrations either as monotherapy or in combination. Optical microscopy was used to monitor the growth pattern and cell death. Based on the monotherapy experiments, we developed a probabilistic mathematical framework in order to describe the drug-induced effect at the single-cell level and simulate drug doses in combination assuming probabilistic independence. Doxorubicin was found to be effective in doses even four orders of magnitude less than Temozolomide in monotherapy. The combination therapy doses tested in vitro were able to lead to irreversible growth inhibition at doses where monotherapy resulted in relapse. In our simulations, we assumed both drugs are anti-mitotic; Temozolomide has a growth-arrest effect, while Doxorubicin is able to cumulatively cause necrosis. Interestingly, under no mechanistic synergy assumption, the in silico predictions underestimate the in vitro results. In silico models allow the exploration of a variety of potential underlying hypotheses. The simulated-biological discrepancy at certain doses indicates a supra-additive response when both drugs are combined. Our results suggest a Temozolomide-Doxorubicin dual chemotherapeutic scheme to both disable proliferation and increase cytotoxicity against Glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTemozolomideDoxorubicinTemozolomideBrain cancerComputational modelsDoxorubicinPreclinical drug-screeningTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID38355655
PMCPMC10866941
OpenAlexW4391809966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.