Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355612›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Sequential stacking link prediction algorithms for temporal networks.

Xie He, Amir Ghasemian, Eun Lee, Aaron Clauset, Peter J Mucha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xie HeDepartment of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-9408
Amir GhasemianYale Institute for Network Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3515-3504
Eun LeeDepartment of Scientific Computing, Pukyong National University, Busan, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3860-3213
Aaron ClausetDepartment of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-8746
Peter J MuchaDepartment of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. peter.j.mucha@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-7230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Link prediction algorithms are indispensable tools in many scientific applications by speeding up network data collection and imputing missing connections. However, in many systems, links change over time and it remains unclear how to optimally exploit such temporal information for link predictions in such networks. Here, we show that many temporal topological features, in addition to having high computational cost, are less accurate in temporal link prediction than sequentially stacked static network features. This sequential stacking link prediction method uses 41 static network features that avoid detailed feature engineering choices and is capable of learning a highly accurate predictive distribution of future connections from historical data. We demonstrate that this algorithm works well for both partially observed and completely unobserved target layers, and on two temporal stochastic block models achieves near-oracle-level performance when combined with other single predictor methods as an ensemble learning method. Finally, we empirically illustrate that stacking multiple predictive methods together further improves performance on 19 real-world temporal networks from different domains.

Identifiers

PMID38355612
PMCPMC10866871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.