Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355607›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Gene-expression-based T-Cell-to-Stroma Enrichment (TSE) score predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial cancer.

Maud Rijnders, J Alberto Nakauma-González, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Alberto Gil-Jimenez, Hayri E Balcioglu, Astrid A M Oostvogels, Maureen J B Aarts, Joost L Boormans, Paul Hamberg, Michiel S van der Heijden and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. OncogenicJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Association of Circulating T Cell and Tumor Microenvironment Profiles with Immune Checkpoint Blockade Outcomes in Sarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Maud Rijnders *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Alberto Nakauma-González *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9153-4280
Debbie G J RobbrechtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-9991
Alberto Gil-JimenezDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0643-6676
Hayri E BalciogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-0180
Astrid A M OostvogelsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maureen J B AartsDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-0436
Paul HambergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam/Schiedam, The Netherlands.
Michiel S van der HeijdenDepartment of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-7881
Bernadett E SzabadosBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Geert J L H van LeendersDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-9102
Niven MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-1831
Jens VoortmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-2614
Hans M WestgeestDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-3638
Ronald de WitDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Astrid A M van der VeldtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Reno DebetsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.debets@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3649-807X
Martijn P LolkemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0466-2928
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University · NLQueen Mary University of London · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 848050012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve overall survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), but therapeutic success at the individual patient level varies significantly. Here we identify predictive markers of response, based on whole-genome DNA (n = 70) and RNA-sequencing (n = 41) of fresh metastatic biopsy samples, collected prior to treatment with pembrolizumab. We find that PD-L1 combined positivity score does not, whereas tumor mutational burden and APOBEC mutagenesis modestly predict response. In contrast, T cell-to-stroma enrichment (TSE) score, computed from gene expression signature data to capture the relative abundance of T cells and stromal cells, predicts response to immunotherapy with high accuracy. Patients with a positive and negative TSE score show progression free survival rates at 6 months of 67 and 0%, respectively. The abundance of T cells and stromal cells, as reflected by the TSE score is confirmed by immunofluorescence in tumor tissue, and its good performance in two independent ICI-treated cohorts of patients with mUC (IMvigor210) and muscle-invasive UC (ABACUS) validate the predictive power of the TSE score. In conclusion, the TSE score represents a clinically applicable metric that potentially supports the prospective selection of patients with mUC for ICI treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProspective StudiesT-LymphocytesB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38355607
PMCPMC10866910
OpenAlexW4394740779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.