ArticleGenome medicine2024
Genome sequencing as a generic diagnostic strategy for rare disease.
Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of next-generation sequencing technology in congenital haemolytic anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A nationwide prospective randomized trial for diagnosing developmental disorders demonstrates genome sequencing outperforms standard of care.Genome medicine · 2026Trial
- Genome sequencing for the diagnosis of intellectual disability as a paradigm for rare diseases in the French healthcare setting: the prospective DEFIDIAG study.Genome medicine · 2025Trial
- Consensus recommendations for next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing in Rare Neurological diseases.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Article
- Three-dimensional facial gestalt analysis for three neurodevelopmental disorders: Koolen-de Vries, Jansen-de Vries and KBG syndrome.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Genomic Strategies in Pediatric Care: Addressing Rare Diseases in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The identification of a PRKACA duplication at 19p13.12 in a female with PPNAD and thyroid carcinoma after a 20-year diagnostic journey.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Genome sequencing reveals high diagnostic yield in children with severe sporadic developmental language disorder.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Near-perfect genome sequencing in medical genetics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Sensitivity of HiFi long-read genome sequencing for difficult-to-detect pathogenic variants when applied to real-world clinical laboratory samples.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Assessing current capabilities for incorporating lipidomics in multiomics data integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Expanding the genetic landscape of inherited metabolic diseases using long-read sequencing and transcriptomic profiling.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Piloting an Interpretive External Quality Assurance Model for Genomic Testing for Childhood Syndromes and Intellectual Disability.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- Article
- Special Issue "Molecular Progression in Genome-Related Diseases".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Applying National Whole-genome Sequencing Findings for Rare Diseases in Clinical Practice: The Imperative of a Multidisciplinary Approach.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Reinterpreting National Whole-genome Sequencing Data: Lessons from the First Korean Pilot Study.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Biofilm dynamics under salt exposure: insights from irrigation piping systems.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo diagnose the full spectrum of hereditary and congenital diseases, genetic laboratories use many different workflows, ranging from karyotyping to exome sequencing. A single generic high-throughput workflow would greatly increase efficiency. We assessed whether genome sequencing (GS) can replace these existing workflows aimed at germline genetic diagnosis for rare disease.
methodsWe performed short-read GS (NovaSeq™6000; 150 bp paired-end reads, 37 × mean coverage) on 1000 cases with 1271 known clinically relevant variants, identified across different workflows, representative of our tertiary diagnostic centers. Variants were categorized into small variants (single nucleotide variants and indels < 50 bp), large variants (copy number variants and short tandem repeats) and other variants (structural variants and aneuploidies). Variant calling format files were queried per variant, from which workflow-specific true positive rates (TPRs) for detection were determined. A TPR of ≥ 98% was considered the threshold for transition to GS. A GS-first scenario was generated for our laboratory, using diagnostic efficacy and predicted false negative as primary outcome measures. As input, we modeled the diagnostic path for all 24,570 individuals referred in 2022, combining the clinical referral, the transition of the underlying workflow(s) to GS, and the variant type(s) to be detected.
resultsOverall, 95% (1206/1271) of variants were detected. Detection rates differed per variant category: small variants in 96% (826/860), large variants in 93% (341/366), and other variants in 87% (39/45). TPRs varied between workflows (79-100%), with 7/10 being replaceable by GS. Models for our laboratory indicate that a GS-first strategy would be feasible for 84.9% of clinical referrals (750/883), translating to 71% of all individuals (17,444/24,570) receiving GS as their primary test. An estimated false negative rate of 0.3% could be expected.
conclusionsGS can capture clinically relevant germline variants in a 'GS-first strategy' for the majority of clinical indications in a genetics diagnostic lab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.