Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355587›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

Female behavior drives the formation of distinct social structures in C57BL/6J versus wild-derived outbred mice in field enclosures.

Caleb C Vogt, Matthew N Zipple, Daniel D Sprockett, Caitlin H Miller, Summer X Hardy, Matthew K Arthur, Adam M Greenstein, Melanie S Colvin, Lucie M Michel, Andrew H Moeller and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
35.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neural basis of social hierarchy across species.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. New neurons flatten social hierarchies.Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Sikkim mouse (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of a non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caleb C VogtLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. ccv26@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9315-3775
Matthew N ZippleLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3451-2103
Daniel D SprockettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2620-7555
Caitlin H MillerLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-1821
Summer X HardyLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-9946
Matthew K ArthurLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-2149
Adam M GreensteinLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Melanie S ColvinLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Lucie M MichelLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Andrew H MoellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-4647
Michael J SheehanLaboratory for Animal Social Evolution and Recognition, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. msheehan@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3949-7873
Cornell University · US

Funding

Research Network on Animal Models to Understand Social Dimensions of AgingR24AG065172 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Susan C. Alberts, Alessandro Bartolomucci · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Uncovering the modes and genetics of gut bacterial transmissionR35GM138284 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Moeller · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
Host-Microbe Interactions that Determine Host Traits and DiseaseT32AI145821 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI145821NIA NIH HHS R24 AG065172NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial behavior and social organization have major influences on individual health and fitness. Yet, biomedical research focuses on studying a few genotypes under impoverished social conditions. Understanding how lab conditions have modified social organizations of model organisms, such as lab mice, relative to natural populations is a missing link between socioecology and biomedical science.

resultsUsing a common garden design, we describe the formation of social structure in the well-studied laboratory mouse strain, C57BL/6J, in replicated mixed-sex populations over 10-day trials compared to control trials with wild-derived outbred house mice in outdoor field enclosures. We focus on three key features of mouse social systems: (i) territory establishment in males, (ii) female social relationships, and (iii) the social networks formed by the populations. Male territorial behaviors were similar but muted in C57 compared to wild-derived mice. Female C57 sharply differed from wild-derived females, showing little social bias toward cage mates and exploring substantially more of the enclosures compared to all other groups. Female behavior consistently generated denser social networks in C57 than in wild-derived mice.

conclusionsC57 and wild-derived mice individually vary in their social and spatial behaviors which scale to shape overall social organization. The repeatable societies formed under field conditions highlights opportunities to experimentally study the interplay between society and individual biology using model organisms.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSocial StructureTerritorialityLaboratory miceSocial structureSocioecologySpace useTerritorialityWild-derived mice

Identifiers

PMID38355587
PMCPMC10865716
OpenAlexW4391831869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.