Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355211›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2024

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a solitary ovarian carcinoma colorectal metastasis.

Ramon-Michel Schreuder, Maud W J Stoop, Jurgen M J Piek, Gesina van Lijnschoten, Erik J Schoon

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramon-Michel SchreuderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ramonmichel.schreuder@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-7387
Maud W J StoopDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jurgen M J PiekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-0631
Gesina van LijnschotenDepartment of Pathology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Erik J SchoonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A woman in her 70s with a medical history of recurrent ovarian carcinoma was referred to the gastroenterologist because of rectal blood loss. Colonoscopy revealed a spontaneously bleeding lesion, which was not a typical colorectal carcinoma by optical diagnosis. Biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of recurrence of the former ovarian carcinoma. The patient was not eligible for surgical resection due to former abdominal surgery and she declined chemotherapy due to severe side effects earlier. After a multidisciplinary team consultation, she was treated with endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR). This is a minimally invasive resection technique for removal of challenging colorectal lesions. The patient has recovered well and 2 years after the metastasis resection with eFTR there still have been no signs of recurrent malignancy.

Indexed as

CarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionOvarian NeoplasmsAgedCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialColonoscopyFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCancer interventionEndoscopyGynecological cancerPathology

Identifiers

PMID38355211
PMCPMC10868322
OpenAlexW4391809035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.