Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355200›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2024

Should carbohydrate-modified diets be the first option for weight loss in people with impaired glucose metabolism? A scoping review.

Katie M Ellison, Holly R Wyatt, James O Hill, R Drew Sayer

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie M EllisonDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2141-2592
Holly R WyattDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-4092
James O HillDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-2264
R Drew SayerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-7030
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
General Mills, Inc. OSP000530514NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the "precision nutrition" movement is at an early stage of development, several investigations have compared low-fat versus carbohydrate (CHO)-modified diets (i.e., low-or-reduced-CHO, low glycemic index/load diets, and high-fiber) in people with normal versus impaired glucose metabolism. The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize evidence in support of the hypothesis that CHO-modified diets are more effective for weight loss among people with impaired glucose metabolism. Fifteen articles were included in this review: seven retrospective analyses of randomized clinical trials and eight prospective randomized clinical trials with prespecified hypotheses related to a diet (low-fat vs. CHO-modified) × phenotype (normal vs. impaired) interaction. Evidence in support of the hypothesis was identified in six of seven retrospective and three of eight prospective studies, which led to a recommendation of CHO-modified diets as a first-line option for people with impaired glucose metabolism. However, the evidence in support of this recommendation is relatively weak, and dietary prescriptions should consider additional contextual information that may influence overall dietary adherence. Additional and rigorous research using innovative randomized experimental approaches is needed for stronger dietary weight loss recommendations based on pretreatment glycemic status.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietDiet, Carbohydrate-RestrictedHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesWeight LossBlood GlucoseDietary Carbohydratescarbohydrate‐modified dietsimpaired glucose metabolismprecision nutritionweight loss

Identifiers

PMID38355200
PMCPMC13625505
OpenAlexW4392783991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.