Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355146›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

Severe mental illness and cardioprotective medication prescribing: a qualitative study in general practice.

Amanda Vettini, Gearóid K Brennan, Stewart W Mercer, Caroline A Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda VettiniCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Amanda.Vettini@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-1360
Gearóid K BrennanFaculty of Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-5099
Stewart W MercerCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-3664
Caroline A JacksonCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-2811
University of Edinburgh · GBGlasgow Centre for Population Health · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with severe mental illness (SMI) die 10-20 years earlier than the general population. They have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet may experience lower cardioprotective medication prescribing.

aimTo understand the challenges experienced by GPs in prescribing cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative study with 15 GPs from 11 practices in two Scottish health boards, including practices servicing highly deprived areas (Deep End).

methodSemi-structured one-to-one interviews with fully qualified GPs with clinical experience of patients with SMI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

resultsParticipants aimed to routinely prescribe cardioprotective medication to relevant patients with SMI but were hampered by various challenges. These structural and contextual barriers included the following: lack of funding for chronic disease management; insufficient consultation time; workforce shortages; IT infrastructure; and navigating boundaries with mental health services. Patient-related barriers included patients' complex health and social needs, their understandable prioritisation of mental health needs or existing physical conditions, and presentation during crises. Professional barriers comprised GPs' desire to practise holistic medicine rather than treating via cardioprotective prescribing in isolation, and concerns about patients' medication concordance if patients were not prioritising this aspect of their health care at that particular time. In terms of enablers for cardioprotective prescribing, participants emphasised continuity of care as fundamental in engaging this patient group in effective cardiovascular health management. A cross-cutting theme was the current GP workforce crisis leading to 'firefighting' and diminishing capacity for primary prevention. This was particularly acute in Deep End practices, which have a high proportion of patients with complex needs and greater resource challenges.

conclusionAlthough participants aspire to prescribe cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI, professional-, system- and patient-level barriers often make this challenging, particularly in deprived areas owing to patient complexity and the inverse care law.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasesmental healthprescribingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38355146
PMCPMC11300976
OpenAlexW4391832075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.