Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38354193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Enhancing machine learning-based sentiment analysis through feature extraction techniques.

Noura A Semary, Wesam Ahmed, Khalid Amin, Paweł Pławiak, Mohamed Hammad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noura A SemaryDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shibin El Kom, Egypt.
Wesam AhmedDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shibin El Kom, Egypt.
Khalid AminDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shibin El Kom, Egypt.
Paweł PławiakDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4317-2801
Mohamed HammadDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shibin El Kom, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6506-3083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial part of sentiment classification is featuring extraction because it involves extracting valuable information from text data, which affects the model's performance. The goal of this paper is to help in selecting a suitable feature extraction method to enhance the performance of sentiment analysis tasks. In order to provide directions for future machine learning and feature extraction research, it is important to analyze and summarize feature extraction techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint. There are several methods under consideration, including Bag-of-words (BOW), Word2Vector, N-gram, Term Frequency- Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Hashing Vectorizer (HV), and Global vector for word representation (GloVe). To prove the ability of each feature extractor, we applied it to the Twitter US airlines and Amazon musical instrument reviews datasets. Finally, we trained a random forest classifier using 70% of the training data and 30% of the testing data, enabling us to evaluate and compare the performance using different metrics. Based on our results, we find that the TD-IDF technique demonstrates superior performance, with an accuracy of 99% in the Amazon reviews dataset and 96% in the Twitter US airlines dataset. This study underscores the paramount significance of feature extraction in sentiment analysis, endowing pragmatic insights to elevate model performance and steer future research pursuits.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSentiment AnalysisHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38354193
PMCPMC10866497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.