Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38354112›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Assembling a global health image: Ethical and pragmatic tensions through the lenses of photographers.

Arsenii Alenichev, Sonya de Laat, Nassisse Solomon, Halina Suwalowska, Koen Peeters Grietens, Michael Parker, Patricia Kingori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Arsenii AlenichevEthox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics & the Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4099-8955
Sonya de LaatFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-3249
Nassisse SolomonThe Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Halina SuwalowskaEthox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics & the Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Koen Peeters GrietensThe Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Michael ParkerEthox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics & the Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patricia KingoriEthox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics & the Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEMcMaster University · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, global health has been confronting its visual culture, historically modulated by colonialism, racism and abusive representation. There have been international calls to promote ethicality of visual practices. However, despite this focus on the history and the institutional use of global health images, little is known about how in practice contemporary images are created in communities, and how consent to be in photographs is obtained.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 29 global health photographers about the ethical and practical challenges they experience in creating global health images, and thematically analysed the findings.

findingsThe following themes were identified: (1) global health photography is undergoing a marketing transformation and images are being increasingly moderated; (2) photographers routinely negotiate stereotypical and abusive tropes purposefully sought by organisations; (3) local scenes are modified, enhanced and staged to achieve a desired marketing effect; (4) 'empowerment' is becoming an increasingly prominent dehumanising visual trope; (5) consent to be photographed can be jeopardised by power imbalances, illiteracy, fears and trust; (6) organisations sometimes problematically recycle images. INTERPRETATION/DISCUSSION: This research has identified practical and ethical issues experienced by global health photographers, suggesting that the production cycle of global health images can be easily abused. The detected themes raise questions of responsibility and accountability, and require further transdisciplinary discussion, especially if promoting ethical photojournalism is the goal for 21st century global health.

Identifiers

PMID38354112
PMCPMC10866471
OpenAlexW4391808410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.