Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38354110›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Holiday effect on childbirth: A population-based analysis of 21,869,652 birth records, 1979-2018.

Miho Sassa, Ryo Kinoshita, Yayoi Murano, Hiromichi Shoji, Daisuke Yoneoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miho SassaDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo KinoshitaCenter for Surveillance, Immunization, and Epidemiologic Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Yayoi MuranoDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromichi ShojiDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-8910
Daisuke YoneokaDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-5092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternity and neonatal services always have to operate 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, and require well preparedness to guarantee safe deliveries for both mothers and babies. However, the evidence of holiday effect from large-scale data is still insufficient from the obstetrics perspective. We analyzed data of over 21 million births in Japan from January 1, 1979, to December 31, 2018. We revealed that the number of births is lower on holidays, and especially among high-risk births such as low birthweight and preterm births. The frequency of high-risk birth has been increasing over the study period, and the variation by the day of week and between holiday and non-holiday have become more prevalent in recent years.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePremature BirthBirth CertificatesFemaleHolidaysHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38354110
PMCPMC10866518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.