Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353933›Full record

SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2024

Letter: Estimating the baseline local recurrence rate for a brain metastasis after neurosurgical resection.

Joshua S Suppree, Siddarth Kannan, David M Hughes, Michael D Jenkinson, Rasheed Zakaria

Abstract readLetterSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua S SuppreeDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Siddarth KannanDepartment of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
David M HughesDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Michael D JenkinsonInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rasheed ZakariaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. rzakaria@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases represent a growing healthcare challenge with a rising incidence attributed to earlier detection and improved systemic cancer treatments. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the local recurrence rate following surgical resection of a brain metastasis without adjuvant therapy. The analysis included four studies with a total of 235 cases. It was found that the rate of local recurrence by 12-months was 48.1% (95% CI 41.2-58.9). These findings underscore the high rate of patients who will experience local recurrence within 12-months of surgery, emphasising the need for vigilant surveillance when omitting adjuvant radiotherapy in favour of systemic treatments with potential but unproven CNS penetrance. The analysis highlights unmet needs in this patient population.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.