Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353906›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Effect of cancer cachexia on first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a claims database study in Japan.

Junji Furuse, Fumihiko Osugi, Koji Machii, Koji Niibe, Toshimitsu Endo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junji FuruseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan. junjifuruse@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-6117
Fumihiko OsugiMedical Affairs, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 8-2, Kyutaromachi 1-Chome Chuo-Ku, Osaka-Shi, 541-8564, Japan.
Koji MachiiMedical Affairs, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 8-2, Kyutaromachi 1-Chome Chuo-Ku, Osaka-Shi, 541-8564, Japan.
Koji NiibeDigital Strategy & Planning, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 8-2, Kyutaromachi 1-Chome Chuo-Ku, Osaka-Shi, 541-8564, Japan.
Toshimitsu EndoMedical Affairs, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 8-2, Kyutaromachi 1-Chome Chuo-Ku, Osaka-Shi, 541-8564, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome leading to progressive functional impairment. How cachexia affects the treatment course of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been well understood.

methodsThis is an exploratory, retrospective, observational cohort study using the Japanese medical claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. The study population included patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was initiated between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020. In this study, we defined patients with cancer cachexia as those who had a weight loss of ≥ 5% in the preceding 6 months. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The observation period was six months from the initiation of first-line FFX or GnP treatment.

resultsA total of 1897 patients (421 patients into the cachexia group; 1476 patients into the non-cachexia group) were analyzed in this study. The median TTF was 121 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 94-146) in the cachexia group and 143 days (95% CI 134-152) in the non-cachexia group. The hazard ratio for TTF of the cachexia versus non-cachexia group was 1.136 (95% CI 0.979-1.319). The median number of doses was two doses fewer in the cachexia group than in the non-cachexia group for both FFX and GnP.

conclusionCancer cachexia was suggested to be associated with shorter TTF and a reduced number of doses in patients with pancreatic cancer who received first-line FFX or GnP treatment. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.jp: UMIN000045820.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCachexiaDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansJapanLeucovorinPaclitaxelRetrospective StudiesDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineLeucovorinPaclitaxelCancer cachexiaDatabase studyNumber of dosesPancreatic cancerTime-to-treatment failure

Identifiers

PMID38353906
PMCPMC10963515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.