ReviewInsights into imaging2024
O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: pearls and pitfalls.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on MR imaging prior to fertility-sparing treatments in patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- Gynecologic imaging errors and pitfalls: how to avoid misdiagnosis on pelvic MRI.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Selected gynecologic MRI mimics and pitfalls: practical problem-solving pearls.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Ultrasonographic assessment of pediatric adnexal lesions: validation of the O-RADS system and development of a simplified C-CAS framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Serous borderline ovarian tumor and low-grade serous ovarian cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- ESUR female pelvis group approach to cystic female pelvic lesions.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based MRI model for differentiating ovarian cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In 2021, the American College of Radiology (ACR) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee developed a risk stratification system and lexicon for assessing adnexal lesions using MRI. Like the BI-RADS classification, O-RADS MRI provides a standardized language for communication between radiologists and clinicians. It is essential for radiologists to be familiar with the O-RADS algorithmic approach to avoid misclassifications. Training, like that offered by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), is essential to ensure accurate and consistent application of the O-RADS MRI system. Tools such as the O-RADS MRI calculator aim to ensure an algorithmic approach. This review highlights the key teaching points, pearls, and pitfalls when using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.Critical relevance statement This article highlights the pearls and pitfalls of using the O-RADS MRI scoring system in clinical practice.Key points• Solid tissue is described as displaying post- contrast enhancement.• Endosalpingeal folds, fimbriated end of the tube, smooth wall, or septa are not solid tissue.• Low-risk TIC has no shoulder or plateau. An intermediate-risk TIC has a shoulder and plateau, though the shoulder is less steep compared to outer myometrium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.