Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353801›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2024

Epistemic (in)justice, social identity and the Black Box problem in patient care.

Muneerah Khan, Cornelius Ewuoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muneerah KhanSteve Biko Centre for Bioethics, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 550470@students.wits.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-5171
Cornelius EwuosoSteve Biko Centre for Bioethics, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-5554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript draws on the moral norms arising from the nuanced accounts of epistemic (in)justice and social identity in relational autonomy to normatively assess and articulate the ethical problems associated with using AI in patient care in light of the Black Box problem. The article also describes how black-boxed AI may be used within the healthcare system. The manuscript highlights what needs to happen to align AI with the moral norms it draws on. Deeper thinking - from other backgrounds other than decolonial scholarship and relational autonomy - about the impact of AI on the human experience needs to be done to appreciate any other barriers that may exist. Future studies can take up this task.

Indexed as

Philosophy, MedicalSocial IdentificationSocial JusticeArtificial IntelligenceHumansMoralsPatient CareBlack Box AIEpistemic justiceHealthcarePatient-centred careSocial identity

Identifiers

PMID38353801
PMCPMC11076305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.