Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353789›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2024

BEST-J Score: Validation of a Predicting Model for Delayed Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on a European Sample.

Vítor Macedo Silva, Ana Isabel Ferreira, Tiago Lima Capela, Sofia Xavier, Pedro Boal Carvalho, José Cotter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vítor Macedo SilvaGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal. vitorbmacedo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-9067
Ana Isabel FerreiraGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-840X
Tiago Lima CapelaGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-4410
Sofia XavierGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-0584
Pedro Boal CarvalhoGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7811-1101
José CotterGastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044, Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-0648
Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira Guimarães · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed bleeding (DB) is a possible adverse event following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The BEST-J score was created as a risk prediction model for DB following gastric ESD, but is yet to be validated in Western populations.

aimsWe aimed to validate the BEST-J score on a European sample and to perform a subgroup analysis according to histological classification.

methodsRetrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing gastric ESD on a European Endoscopic Unit. DB was defined as hemorrhage with clinical symptoms and confirmed by emergency endoscopy from the time of completion to 28 days after ESD. BEST-J score was calculated in each patient and confronted with the outcome (DB).

resultsFinal sample included 161 patients. From these, 10 (6.2%) presented DB following ESD, with a median time to bleeding of 7 days (IQR 6.8). BEST-J score presented an excellent accuracy predicting DB in our sample, with an AUC = 0.907 (95%CI 0.801-1.000; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by histological classification proved that the discriminative power was still excellent for each grade: low-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.970 (p < 0.001); high-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.874 (p < 0.001); early gastric cancer-AUC = 0.881 (p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value to predict DB was a BEST-J score ≥ 3, which matches the cut-off value for high-risk of bleeding in the original investigation.

conclusionsThe BEST-J score still presents excellent accuracy in risk stratification for post-ESD bleeding in European individuals. Thus, this score may help to guide which patients benefit the most from prophylactic therapies following gastric ESD in this setting.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionStomach NeoplasmsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastric MucosaHumansPostoperative HemorrhageRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDelayed bleedingEarly gastric cancerEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38353789
OpenAlexW4391811725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.