Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353784›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

Human social buffer in goats and dogs.

Anna Scandurra, Biagio D'Aniello, Maria Elena Pero, Claudia Pinelli, Alfredo Di Lucrezia, Raffaella Tudisco, Piera Iommelli, Vincenzo Mastellone, Pietro Lombardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna ScandurraDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-2948
Biagio D'AnielloDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126, Naples, Italy. biagio.daniello@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-946X
Maria Elena PeroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7262-6350
Claudia PinelliDepartment of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Vivaldi, 43, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-9886
Alfredo Di LucreziaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-2302
Raffaella TudiscoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-0328
Piera IommelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-0104
Vincenzo Mastellone *Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-708X
Pietro Lombardi *Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-8800
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to explore the social buffering effect that humans offer to goats and dogs with limited exposure to human socialization, particularly in situations involving interactions with unfamiliar humans. A total of 13 dogs and 14 goats were selected for the study, all of which had limited prior socialization with humans. Each animal was placed in a testing room with unfamiliar humans for 15 min. Three experimenters aimed to establish a comfortable environment, encouraging social interaction by offering food to the animals and assessing the animals' willingness to accept food and their response to being approached and petted. If both conditions were satisfied, the animals were classified as "social". If one or none of the conditions were met, the animals were classified as "not social". Cortisol levels were measured by collecting blood samples before and after the test. Non-parametric tests together with a GzLM showed that the effect of human social buffering in goats was different in comparison to dogs: goats exhibited higher cortisol levels after the test, while dogs did not show a significant change. Further analysis demonstrated that "social" goats had a lower likelihood of experiencing significant changes in cortisol levels than dogs. Thus, once human interactions are accepted, both species could benefit from social buffering. In summary, this study enhances our understanding of how dogs and goats respond to social interactions with humans in the social buffering effect.

Indexed as

GoatsHydrocortisoneAnimalsDogsFoodHumansProbabilityHydrocortisoneCortisolDog (Canis lupus familiaris)DomesticationGoat (Capra hircus)Stress

Identifiers

PMID38353784
PMCPMC10866781
OpenAlexW4391821307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.