Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353767›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Cochlear implant therapy improves the quality of life and social participation in the elderly: a prospective long-term evaluation.

Christian Issing, Andreas G Loth, Kenan D Sakmen, Leon Guchlerner, Silke Helbig, Uwe Baumann, Johannes Pantel, Timo Stöver

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Disparities Through the County Health Rankings System.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian Issing *Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. christian@issing.email.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-8306
Andreas G Loth *Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Kenan D SakmenDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Leon GuchlernerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Silke HelbigDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Uwe BaumannDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Johannes PantelWorking Group On Geriatric Medicine Specializing in Psychogeriatric Medicine and Clinical Gerontology, Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Timo StöverDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, the number of elderly cochlear implant (CI) candidates is continuously rising. In addition to the audiological improvement, other positive effects of CI treatment can also be observed in clinical routine. The "quality of life" as a parameter of success directly experienced by the patient is increasingly becoming the focus of clinical research. Although there are already clear indications of a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life, there is still a lack of systematic, prospectively collected longitudinal long-term data in patients over the age of 65.

methodsThis prospective longitudinal observational study included 31 patients between the age of 71 and 92 years who had first been treated unilaterally with a CI 6 years ago. In addition to free-field monosyllable recognition, quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-old (WHOQL-OLD). The results were compared with the data from our previous study, in which we focused on the short- and medium-term effects on quality of life. In both studies, the same patient population was examined. In addition, these study data were compared with an age-matched average population.

resultsIn speech recognition, there was no significant change from the control 6 months postoperatively compared with the results 6 years postoperatively. No significant changes occurred in the total quality of life score or any of the other six facets of quality of life when comparing the results 6 months postoperatively with the results 6 years postoperatively. In "Social participation", the CI patients even exceed the values of the age-matched average population 6 years after treatment.

conclusionImprovement in the quality of life and especially in social participation appears stable over many years in elderly patients after hearing rehabilitation with a CI.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsQuality of LifeSocial ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesSpeech PerceptionTreatment OutcomeCochlear implantElderlyLong-term resultsOlder patientsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38353767
PMCPMC11211127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.