Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353736›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Factors associated with increased length of stay and risk of complications in 336 patients submitted to spine surgery. The role of a validated capture system (SAVES v2) as a first-line tool to properly face the problem.

Luigi Falzetti, Cristiana Griffoni, Elisa Carretta, Andrea Pezzi, Annalisa Monetta, Carlotta Cavallari, Riccardo Ghermandi, Giuseppe Tedesco, Silvia Terzi, Stefano Bandiera and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luigi Falzetti *Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Cristiana Griffoni *Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8344-7534
Elisa CarrettaDepartment of Programming and Monitoring, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea PezziIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Annalisa MonettaDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Carlotta CavallariDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo GhermandiDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. riccardo.ghermandi@ior.it.
Giuseppe TedescoDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia TerziDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano BandieraDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Gisberto EvangelistiDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco GirolamiDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Valerio PipolaDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni TosiniDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi Emanuele NoliDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GasbarriniDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni Barbanti BrodanoDepartment of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute grant 5x1000- 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we analyzed the use of a validated capture system (Spinal Adverse Events Severity system, SAVES V2) as a first non-technical skill to properly face the relevant problem of surgical complications (SCs) and adverse events (AEs) in spinal surgery.

methodsWe retrospectively collected AEs occurring in a tertiary referral center for spine surgery from January 2017 to January 2018 and classified them according to SAVES V2 system. We compared this collection of AEs with a prospective collection performed without any classification system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determined odds ratio (ORs) for selected potential risk factors of AEs and prolonged length of stay.

resultsOverall a higher number of AEs was retrospectively recorded using SAVES system compared to the prospective recording without the use of any capture system (97/336 vs 210/336, p < 0.001). The length of stay (LOS) increased in the group of complicated patients for all the procedures examined. In the non-oncological group, LOS was significantly higher for complicated patients compared to uncomplicated patients (F = 44.11, p = 0.0000). Similar results have been obtained in the oncological group of patients. In the multivariate regression model surgical time and postoperative AEs emerged as risk factors for prolonged LOS, while only the presence of previous surgeries was confirmed as risk factor for AEs.

conclusionConsidering that the rate of AEs and SCs in spinal surgery is still high despite the improvement of technical skills, we suggest the use of SAVES V2 capture system as a first-line tool to face the problem.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsSpineHumansLength of StayProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventComplicationNon-technical skillSafetySpinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.