ArticleMolecular omics2024
Open-tubular trap columns: towards simple and robust liquid chromatography separations for single-cell proteomics.
Article in Molecular omics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thiol-Ene Click-Derived Porous-Layer Open-Tubular Column for Online Purification and Multiplex LC-MS/MS Analysis of Neurotransmitters.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Optimization of trap column properties and loading conditions for proteome profiling of single-cell-level sample inputs.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Single-cell proteomics using mass spectrometry.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Review
- Development of an efficient, effective, and economical technology for proteome analysis.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoflow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is key to enabling in-depth proteome profiling of trace samples, including single cells, but these separations can lack robustness due to the use of narrow-bore columns that are susceptible to clogging. In the case of single-cell proteomics, offline cleanup steps are generally omitted to avoid losses to additional surfaces, and online solid-phase extraction/trap columns frequently provide the only opportunity to remove salts and insoluble debris before the sample is introduced to the analytical column. Trap columns are traditionally short, packed columns used to load and concentrate analytes at flow rates greater than those employed in analytical columns, and since these first encounter the uncleaned sample mixture, trap columns are also susceptible to clogging. We hypothesized that clogging could be avoided by using large-bore porous layer open tubular trap columns (PLOTrap). The low back pressure ensured that the PLOTraps could also serve as the sample loop, thus allowing sample cleanup and injection with a single 6-port valve. We found that PLOTraps could effectively remove debris to avoid column clogging. We also evaluated multiple stationary phases and PLOTrap diameters to optimize performance in terms of peak widths and sample loading capacities. Optimized PLOTraps were compared to conventional packed trap columns operated in forward and backflush modes, and were found to have similar chromatographic performance of backflushed traps while providing improved debris removal for robust analysis of trace samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.