Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353714›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2024

Effect of aggressive vs conservative screening and confirmatory test on time to extubation among patients at low or intermediate risk: a randomized clinical trial.

Gonzalo Hernández Martínez, Patricia Rodriguez, Jesus Soto, Oriol Caritg, Andrea Castellví-Font, Borja Mariblanca, Antonio Maria García, Laura Colinas, Jose Manuel Añon, Francisco Jose Parrilla-Gomez and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Gonzalo Hernández MartínezComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain. ghernandezm@telefonica.net.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-4487
Patricia RodriguezComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Jesus SotoHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Oriol CaritgHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea Castellví-FontHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Borja MariblancaHospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
Antonio Maria GarcíaHospital Santa Barbara, Puertollano, Spain.
Laura ColinasComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Jose Manuel AñonHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Jose Parrilla-GomezHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Alberto Silva-ObregónHospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
Joan Ramon MasclansHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia PropinPrograma Investigo SESCAM, Palma, Spain.
Alicia CuadraComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Mario Guillermo DalorzoComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Gemma RialpHospital Universitario Son Llàtzer, Palma, Spain.
Fernando Suarez-SipmannHospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Oriol RocaParc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut de Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Sabadell, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Son Llatzer · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESServicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to determine the best strategy to achieve fast and safe extubation.

methodsThis multicenter trial randomized patients with primary respiratory failure and low-to-intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) preventive therapy. It included four groups: (1) conservative screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO

resultsRandomization to the aggressive-aggressive group was discontinued at the interim analysis for safety reasons. Thus, 884 patients who underwent at least 1 SBT were analyzed (conservative-conservative group, n = 256; conservative-aggressive group, n = 267; aggressive-conservative group, n = 261; aggressive-aggressive, n = 100). Median time to extubation was lower in the groups with aggressive screening (p < 0.001). Simple weaning rates were 45.7%, 76.78% (205 patients), 71.65%, and 91% (p < 0.001), respectively. Reintubation rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.431).

conclusionAmong patients at low or intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned HFNC, combining aggressive screening with preventive PEEP and a conservative SBT reduced the time to extubation without increasing the reintubation rate.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationArteriesHumansOxygenPartial PressurePressureOxygenExtubationMechanical ventilationScreeningSpontaneous breathing trialWeaning

Identifiers

PMID38353714
OpenAlexW4391823127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.