Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353698›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[Conclusion instead of exclusion-The clinical diagnosis of functional movement disorders].

Anne Weissbach, Christina Bolte, Alexander Münchau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne WeissbachInstitut für Systemische Motorikforschung, CBBM, Universität zu Lübeck, Marie-Curie-Straße Haus 66, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. anne.weissbach@uni-luebeck.de.
Christina BolteInstitut für Systemische Motorikforschung, CBBM, Universität zu Lübeck, Marie-Curie-Straße Haus 66, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Alexander MünchauInstitut für Systemische Motorikforschung, CBBM, Universität zu Lübeck, Marie-Curie-Straße Haus 66, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neurological movement disorders are common in neurological practice and lead to a high degree of impairment and chronification. Affected patients usually receive a diagnosis with considerable delay and often do not get disease-specific treatment. The reasons for this delay are related to extensive diagnostic measures to exclude other nonfunctional neurological diseases. As a consequence, functional movement disorders are typically communicated as diagnoses of exclusion, which makes it difficult for patients to understand and accept the diagnosis. This is particularly unfortunate, because in the majority of patients the diagnosis can be made with confidence based on clinical features, i.e., inconsistency and incongruence. The clarification of the symptoms and the resulting treatment options should be supplemented by patient-friendly explanations of the pathophysiological basis of the disease. In this way, patients are enabled to understand and accept the diagnosis. Moreover, it can put an end to the search for a diagnosis, which can sometimes take decades, and paves the way for treatment. Thus, the diagnosis by exclusion itself becomes the starting point for treatment and can itself have a therapeutic effect.

Indexed as

Movement DisordersConversion DisorderDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansNeurologic ExaminationClinical characteristicsDiagnosis by exclusionDiagnostic criteriaIncongruenceInconsistency

Identifiers

PMID38353698
PMCPMC11178591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.