Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353255›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2024

Relative aerobic load of walking in people with multiple sclerosis.

Arianne S Gravesteijn, Sjoerd T Timmermans, Jip Aarts, Hanneke E Hulst, Brigit A De Jong, Heleen Beckerman, Vincent De Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arianne S GravesteijnMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.gravesteijn@amsterdamumc.nl.
Sjoerd T TimmermansMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jip AartsMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leiden University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology unit, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, The Netherlands.
Hanneke E HulstAmsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leiden University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology unit, Leiden, The Netherlands; MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brigit A De JongAmsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen BeckermanMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent De GrootMS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Neuroinfection & Neuroinflammation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the energy demand of walking relative to aerobic capacity in people with multiple sclerosis.

designCross-sectional cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 45 people with multiple sclerosis (32 females), median disease duration 15 years (interquartile range (IQR) 9; 20), median Expanded Disability Status Scale 4 (min-max range: 2.0; 6.0).

methodsAerobic capacity, derived from a cardiopulmonary exercise test and gas exchange measurements, assessed during a 6-min overground walk test at comfortable speed, were analysed. The relative aerobic load of walking was determined as the energy demand of walking relative to oxygen uptake at peak and at the first ventilatory threshold. Healthy reference data were used for clinical inference.

resultsPeople with multiple sclerosis walk at a mean relative aerobic load of 60.0% (standard deviation 12.8%) relative to peak aerobic capacity, and 89.1% (standard deviation 19.9%) relative to the first ventilatory threshold. Fourteen participants walked above the first ventilatory threshold (31%). Peak aerobic capacity was reduced in 45% of participants, and energy demands were increased in 52% of participants.

conclusionPeople with multiple sclerosis walk at a relative aerobic load close to their first ventilatory threshold. A high relative aerobic load can guide clinicians to improve aerobic capacity or reduce the energy demands of walking.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansWalking

Identifiers

PMID38353255
PMCPMC10875758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.