Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38353214›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Patient Outcomes by Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function.

Jacqueline Levene, Andrew Voigt, Floyd Thoma, Suresh Mulukutla, Aditya Bhonsale, Krishna Kancharla, Alaa Shalaby, N A Mark Estes, Sandeep Jain, Samir Saba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging diastolic function assessment in preserved ejection fraction and absence of late gadolinium enhancement.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline LeveneHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-5953
Andrew VoigtHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1577-6541
Floyd ThomaHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.
Suresh MulukutlaHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5060-429X
Aditya BhonsaleHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7827-5977
Krishna KancharlaHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2550-9359
Alaa ShalabyHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2000-7678
N A Mark EstesHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-7247
Sandeep JainHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5815-370X
Samir SabaHeart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-803X
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular dysfunction is characterized by systolic and diastolic parameters, leading to heart failure (HF) with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF), respectively. The goal of this study is to examine the impact of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction (DD) on patient outcomes. METHODS AND

resultsTwo cohorts were used in this analysis: Cohort A included 136 455 patients with EF ≥50%, stratified by the presence and grade of DD. Cohort B included 16 850 patients with EF <50%, stratified by EF quartiles. Patients were followed to the end points of all-cause death and cardiovascular, HF, or cardiac arrest hospitalizations. Over a median follow-up of 3.42 years, 23 946 (16%) patients died and 31 113 (20%), 13 305 (9%), and 1269 (1%) were hospitalized for cardiovascular, HF, or cardiac arrest causes, respectively. With adjustment for comorbidities, the risk of all-cause mortality and of cardiovascular and HF hospitalizations increased steadily with increasing grade of DD in patients with normal EF, and even more so in patients with worsening EF. The risk of hospitalization for cardiac arrest in patients with grade III DD, however, was comparable to that of patients with EF <25% (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.01]) and worse than that of patients in better EF quartiles.

conclusionsAlthough systolic dysfunction is associated with a greater risk of overall death and HF hospitalizations than DD, the risk of cardiac arrest in patients with grade II and III DD is comparable to that of patients with moderate and severe systolic dysfunction, respectively. Future studies are needed to examine treatment strategies than can improve these outcomes.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart ArrestHeart FailureDiastoleHumansStroke VolumeSystoleVentricular Function, Leftdeathdiastolic dysfunctionejection fractionhospitalizationmyocardial function

Identifiers

PMID38353214
PMCPMC11010111
OpenAlexW4391813882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.