ArticleHeliyon2024
A machine learning and deep learning-based integrated multi-omics technique for leukemia prediction.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics integration for plant enhancement: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Computer-aided drug design in acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review of advances, challenges, and future prospect.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in deep learning for leukemia diagnosis: a scoping review of diagnostic modalities and fusion-based approaches.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- AI-driven multi-omics integration in precision oncology: bridging the data deluge to clinical decisions.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- AI-driven prognostics in pediatric bone marrow transplantation: a CAD approach with Bayesian and PSO optimization.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Sul-BertGRU: an ensemble deep learning method integrating information entropy-enhanced BERT and directional multi-GRU for S-sulfhydration sites prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Omics in mini-livestock: a genomic perspective on the future of sustainable food systems.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Article
- Toward Precision Medicine in Celiac Disease: Emerging Roles of Multiomics and Artificial Intelligence.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2025Review
- Advancements in multi-omics research to address challenges in Alzheimer's disease: a systems biology approach utilizing molecular biomarkers and innovative strategies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, scientific data on cancer has expanded, providing potential for a better understanding of malignancies and improved tailored care. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) processing power and algorithmic development position Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) as crucial players in predicting Leukemia, a blood cancer, using integrated multi-omics technology. However, realizing these goals demands novel approaches to harness this data deluge. This study introduces a novel Leukemia diagnosis approach, analyzing multi-omics data for accuracy using ML and DL algorithms. ML techniques, including Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), and DL methods such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN) are compared. GB achieved 97 % accuracy in ML, while RNN outperformed by achieving 98 % accuracy in DL. This approach filters unclassified data effectively, demonstrating the significance of DL for leukemia prediction. The testing validation was based on 17 different features such as patient age, sex, mutation type, treatment methods, chromosomes, and others. Our study compares ML and DL techniques and chooses the best technique that gives optimum results. The study emphasizes the implications of high-throughput technology in healthcare, offering improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.