Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352782›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Swinging between the beneficial and harmful microbial community in biofloc technology: A paradox.

Edward Terhemen Akange, Athanasius Aondohemen Aende, Hajar Rastegari, Olumide A Odeyemi, Nor Azman Kasan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward Terhemen AkangeHigher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Athanasius Aondohemen AendeDepartment of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University (formerly, Federal University of Agriculture), Makurdi, P.M.B.2373, Benue State, Nigeria.
Hajar RastegariHigher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Olumide A OdeyemiOffice of Research Services, Research Division, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Nor Azman KasanHigher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofloc Technology (BFT) is proven to be the fulcrum of sustainable recirculating aquaculture system especially under zero water discharge condition. The efficiency of BFT system is reinforced by an unswerving microbial community in the system. Several researchers have made copious reports on the microorganisms in BFT and identified heterotrophic bacteria predominant in the microbial composition. A summary of these researches considers these microorganisms playing the role of chemo-photosynthetic autotrophs, organic detoxifiers, probiotic, decomposers/bioflocculants, bio-leachers and pathogens. Although these functional roles are well identified, the reports have failed to sufficiently illustrate the borderline at which these microbial communities fail to serve their beneficial roles in BFT system. This review paper firstly presents a snapshot of some indispensable water quality conditions and zootechnical variables aided by the microbial community in floc as well as the amphibolic process that synthesizes nutrient from the organic deposit in BFT. Furthermore, information on the microbial community in BFT is evaluated to have

Indexed as

Amphibolic processFunctional characterisationHeterotrophic bacteriaWater qualityZootechnical variables

Identifiers

PMID38352782
PMCPMC10861956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.