ArticleHeliyon2024
Performance of convolutional neural networks for the classification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Approach for Brain-Tumor Detection and Classification from MRI Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Research progress of deep learning based on magnetic resonance imaging in meningioma.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Brain tumor classification using optimized ResNet50 with dynamic precision optimization for enhanced speed and diagnostic accuracy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Digital Eye: Deep Learning for Detecting Physeal Fractures of the Pediatric Distal Radius.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- A Robust ConvNeXt-Based Framework for Efficient, Generalizable, and Explainable Brain Tumor Classification on MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning based NeuroFusionNet approach for automated brain tumor diagnosis from MRI.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- A swarm intelligence-driven hybrid framework for brain tumor classification with enhanced deep features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detection and classification of brain tumor using a hybrid learning model in CT scan images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimized deep learning for brain tumor detection: a hybrid approach with attention mechanisms and clinical explainability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-Time Detection of Meningiomas by Image Segmentation: A Very Deep Transfer Learning Convolutional Neural Network Approach.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Brain tumor classification using GAN-augmented data with autoencoders and Swin Transformers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Brain tumor classification utilizing pixel distribution and spatial dependencies higher-order statistical measurements through explainable ML models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An efficient brain tumor detection and classification using pre-trained convolutional neural network models.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using an Optimized Convolutional Neural Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- IMPA-Net: Interpretable Multi-Part Attention Network for Trustworthy Brain Tumor Classification from MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Brain Tumor Detection and Categorization with Segmentation of Improved Unsupervised Clustering Approach and Machine Learning Classifier.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Trade-off between training and testing ratio in machine learning for medical image processing.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural networks: applications, challenges and future prospects in brain tumor research.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors are a diverse group of neoplasms that are challenging to detect and classify due to their varying characteristics. Deep learning techniques have proven to be effective in tumor classification. However, there is a lack of studies that compare these techniques using a common methodology. This work aims to analyze the performance of convolutional neural networks in the classification of brain tumors. We propose a network consisting of a few convolutional layers, batch normalization, and max-pooling. Then, we explore recent deep architectures, such as VGG, ResNet, EfficientNet, or ConvNeXt. The study relies on two magnetic resonance imaging datasets with over 3000 images of three types of tumors -gliomas, meningiomas, and pituitary tumors-, as well as images without tumors. We determine the optimal hyperparameters of the networks using the training and validation sets. The training and test sets are used to assess the performance of the models from different perspectives, including training from scratch, data augmentation, transfer learning, and fine-tuning. The experiments are performed using the TensorFlow and Keras libraries in Python. We compare the accuracy of the models and analyze their complexity based on the capacity of the networks, their training times, and image throughput. Several networks achieve high accuracy rates on both datasets, with the best model achieving 98.7% accuracy, which is on par with state-of-the-art methods. The average precision for each type of tumor is 94.3% for gliomas, 93.8% for meningiomas, 97.9% for pituitary tumors, and 95.3% for images without tumors. VGG is the largest model with over 171 million parameters, whereas MobileNet and EfficientNetB0 are the smallest ones with 3.2 and 5.9 million parameters, respectively. These two neural networks are also the fastest to train with 23.7 and 25.4 seconds per epoch, respectively. On the other hand, ConvNext is the slowest model with 58.2 seconds per epoch. Our custom model obtained the highest image throughput with 234.37 images per second, followed by MobileNet with 226 images per second. ConvNext obtained the smallest throughput with 97.35 images per second. ResNet, MobileNet, and EfficientNet are the most accurate networks, with MobileNet and EfficientNet demonstrating superior performance in terms of complexity. Most models achieve the best accuracy using transfer learning followed by a fine-tuning step. However, data augmentation does not contribute to increasing the accuracy of the models in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.