Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352621›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Examining motor evidence for the pause-then-cancel model of action-stopping: Insights from motor system physiology.

Joshua R Tatz, Madeline O Carlson, Carson Lovig, Jan R Wessel

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua R TatzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6960-8909
Madeline O CarlsonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.
Carson LovigDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.
Jan R WesselDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-6601

Funding

The role of cortical and subcortical β-bursts in the cognitive control of human movementR01NS117753 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jan R Wessel · 2020 to 2026
$2.9M
The Role of a Neural Mechanism for Inhibitory Control in Cognitive FlexibilityR01NS102201 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WESSEL, JAN R · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102201NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stopping initiated actions is fundamental to adaptive behavior. Longstanding, single-process accounts of action-stopping have been challenged by recent, two-process, 'pause-then-cancel' models. These models propose that action-stopping involves two inhibitory processes: 1) a fast Pause process, which broadly suppresses the motor system as the result of detecting any salient event, and 2) a slower Cancel process, which involves motor suppression specific to the cancelled action. A purported signature of the Pause process is global suppression, or the reduced corticospinal excitability (CSE) of task-unrelated effectors early on in action-stopping. However, unlike the Pause process, few (if any) motor system signatures of a Cancel process have been identified. Here, we used single- and paired-pulse TMS methods to comprehensively measure the local physiological excitation and inhibition of both responding and task-unrelated motor effector systems during action-stopping. Specifically, we measured CSE, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP). Consistent with key predictions from the pause-then-cancel model, CSE measurements at the responding effector indicated that additional suppression was necessary to counteract Go-related increases in CSE during-action-stopping, particularly at later timepoints. Increases in SICI on Stop-signal trials did not differ across responding and non-responding effectors, or across timepoints. This suggests SICI as a potential source of global suppression. Increases in CSP duration on Stop-signal trials were more prominent at later timepoints. SICI and CSP duration therefore appeared most consistent with the Pause and Cancel processes, respectively. Our study provides further evidence from motor system physiology that multiple inhibitory processes influence action-stopping.

Indexed as

GABAinhibitory controlintracortical inhibitionpaired-pulse TMSStop signal task

Identifiers

PMID38352621
PMCPMC10862812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.