Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352578›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A systematic evaluation of computational methods for cell segmentation.

Yuxing Wang, Junhan Zhao, Hongye Xu, Cheng Han, Zhiqiang Tao, Dawei Zhou, Tong Geng, Dongfang Liu, Zhicheng Ji

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuxing WangDepartment of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Junhan ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hongye XuDepartment of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Cheng HanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Zhiqiang TaoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dawei ZhouDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Tong GengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dongfang LiuDepartment of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Zhicheng JiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

The Duke Senescent Cell Evaluations in Normal Tissues (SCENT) Mapping CenterU54AG075936 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, CLIBURN C · 2021 to 2025
$12.7M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG075936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell segmentation is a fundamental task in analyzing biomedical images. Many computational methods have been developed for cell segmentation and instance segmentation, but their performances are not well understood in various scenarios. We systematically evaluated the performance of 18 segmentation methods to perform cell nuclei and whole cell segmentation using light microscopy and fluorescence staining images. We found that general-purpose methods incorporating the attention mechanism exhibit the best overall performance. We identified various factors influencing segmentation performances, including image channels, choice of training data, and cell morphology, and evaluated the generalizability of methods across image modalities. We also provide guidelines for choosing the optimal segmentation methods in various real application scenarios. We developed Seggal, an online resource for downloading segmentation models already pre-trained with various tissue and cell types, substantially reducing the time and effort for training cell segmentation models.

Indexed as

BenchmarkCell segmentationDeep learningImaging

Identifiers

PMID38352578
PMCPMC10862744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.