Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352557›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Predicting post-stroke cognitive impairment using electronic health record data.

Jeffrey M Ashburner, Yuchiao Chang, Bianca Porneala, Sanjula D Singh, Nirupama Yechoor, Jonathan M Rosand, Daniel E Singer, Christopher D Anderson, Steven J Atlas

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey M AshburnerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yuchiao ChangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bianca PornealaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sanjula D SinghMcCance Center for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nirupama YechoorMcCance Center for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6479-9155
Jonathan M RosandMcCance Center for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel E SingerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher D AndersonMcCance Center for Brain Health and Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven J AtlasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Identifying primary care patients at increased risk of atrial fibrillation for screening interventionsK01HL148506 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ASHBURNER, JEFFREY M · 2019 to 2023
$887k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL148506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Secondary prevention interventions to reduce post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) can be aided by the early identification of high-risk individuals who would benefit from risk factor modification. Objective: To develop and evaluate a predictive model to identify patients at increased risk of PSCI over 5 years using data easily accessible from electronic health records. Design: Cohort study with patients enrolled between 2003-2016 with follow-up through 2022. Setting: Primary care practices affiliated with two academic medical centers. Participants: Individuals 45 years or older, without prior stroke or prevalent cognitive impairment, with primary care visits and an incident ischemic stroke between 2003-2016 (development/internal validation cohort) or 2010-2022 (external validation cohort). Exposures: Predictors of PSCI were ascertained from the electronic health record. Main Outcome: The outcome was incident dementia/cognitive impairment within 5 years and beginning 3 months following stroke, ascertained using ICD-9/10 codes. For model variable selection, we considered potential predictors of PSCI and constructed 400 bootstrap samples with two-thirds of the model derivation sample. We ran 10-fold cross-validated Cox proportional hazards models using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty. Variables selected in >25% of samples were included. Results: The analysis included 332 incident diagnoses of PSCI in the development cohort (n=3,741), and 161 and 128 incident diagnoses in the internal (n=1,925) and external (n=2,237) validation cohorts. The c-statistic for predicting PSCI was 0.731 (95% CI: 0.694-0.768) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.681-0.766) in the external validation cohort. A risk score based on the beta coefficients of predictors from the development cohort stratified patients into low (0-7 points), intermediate (8-11 points), and high (12-35 points) risk groups. The hazard ratios for incident PSCI were significantly different by risk categories in internal (High, HR: 6.2, 95% CI 4.1-9.3; Intermediate, HR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8-4.1) and external (High, HR: 6.1, 95% CI: 3.9-9.6; Intermediate, HR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.9-4.3) validation cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: Five-year risk of PSCI can be accurately predicted using routinely collected data. Model output can be used to risk stratify and identify individuals at increased risk for PSCI for preventive efforts.

Indexed as

post-stroke cognitive impairmentrisk predictionrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID38352557
PMCPMC10863024
OpenAlexW4391521830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.