ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Identification and characterization of a potentially novel dorsal cutaneous muscle in rodents.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the course of performing a detailed dissection of adult rat to map the cutaneous nerves of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels a small and unexpected structure was isolated. It appeared to be a cutaneous striated muscle and was observed in both male and female rats and in mice but absent from cats and humans. With the skin reflected laterally from midline, the muscle lies closely apposed to the lateral border of the Thoracic Trapezius (Spinotrapezius) muscle and is easily missed in standard gross dissections. Focussed prosections were performed to identify the origin, insertion, and course of gross innervation. Identification of each of these elements showed them to be distinct from the nearby Trapezius and Cutaneous Trunci (Cutaneous Maximus in mouse) muscles. The striated muscle nature of the structure was validated with whole-mount microscopy. Consulting a range of published rodent anatomical atlases and gross anatomical experts revealed no prior descriptions. This preliminary report is an opportunity for the anatomical and research communities to provide input to either confirm the novelty of this muscle or refer to prior published descriptions in rodents or other species while the muscle, its innervation, and function are further characterized. Presuming this muscle is indeed novel, the name "Cutaneous Scapularis muscle" is proposed in accord with general principles of the anatomical field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.