ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory neural coding of speech-relevant temporal cues can be noninvasively probed using envelope following responses (EFRs), neural ensemble responses phase-locked to the stimulus amplitude envelope. EFRs emphasize different neural generators, such as the auditory brainstem or auditory cortex, by altering the temporal modulation rate of the stimulus. EFRs can be an important diagnostic tool to assess auditory neural coding deficits that go beyond traditional audiometric estimations. Existing approaches to measure EFRs use discrete amplitude modulated (AM) tones of varying modulation frequencies, which is time consuming and inefficient, impeding clinical translation. Here we present a faster and more efficient framework to measure EFRs across a range of AM frequencies using stimuli that dynamically vary in modulation rates, combined with spectrally specific analyses that offer optimal spectrotemporal resolution. EFRs obtained from several species (humans, Mongolian gerbils, Fischer-344 rats, and Cba/CaJ mice) showed robust, high-SNR tracking of dynamic AM trajectories (up to 800Hz in humans, and 1.4 kHz in rodents), with a fivefold decrease in recording time and thirtyfold increase in spectrotemporal resolution. EFR amplitudes between dynamic AM stimuli and traditional discrete AM tokens within the same subjects were highly correlated (94% variance explained) across species. Hence, we establish a time-efficient and spectrally specific approach to measure EFRs. These results could yield novel clinical diagnostics for precision audiology approaches by enabling rapid, objective assessment of temporal processing along the entire auditory neuraxis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.