Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352339›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.

Satyabrata Parida, Kimberly Yurasits, Victoria E Cancel, Maggie E Zink, Claire Mitchell, Meredith C Ziliak, Audrey V Harrison, Edward L Bartlett, Aravindakshan Parthasarathy

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satyabrata ParidaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-2522
Kimberly YurasitsDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Victoria E CancelDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maggie E ZinkDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Claire MitchellDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Meredith C ZiliakDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Audrey V HarrisonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Edward L BartlettDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-1854
Aravindakshan ParthasarathyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-8004
University of Pittsburgh · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Training in Auditory and Vestibular NeuroscienceT32DC011499 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Karl Kandler, BILL J YATES · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
Research Supplement - Luz AndrinoR21DC018882 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PARTHASARATHY, ARAVINDAKSHAN · 2022 to 2024
$666k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018882NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC011499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory neural coding of speech-relevant temporal cues can be noninvasively probed using envelope following responses (EFRs), neural ensemble responses phase-locked to the stimulus amplitude envelope. EFRs emphasize different neural generators, such as the auditory brainstem or auditory cortex, by altering the temporal modulation rate of the stimulus. EFRs can be an important diagnostic tool to assess auditory neural coding deficits that go beyond traditional audiometric estimations. Existing approaches to measure EFRs use discrete amplitude modulated (AM) tones of varying modulation frequencies, which is time consuming and inefficient, impeding clinical translation. Here we present a faster and more efficient framework to measure EFRs across a range of AM frequencies using stimuli that dynamically vary in modulation rates, combined with spectrally specific analyses that offer optimal spectrotemporal resolution. EFRs obtained from several species (humans, Mongolian gerbils, Fischer-344 rats, and Cba/CaJ mice) showed robust, high-SNR tracking of dynamic AM trajectories (up to 800Hz in humans, and 1.4 kHz in rodents), with a fivefold decrease in recording time and thirtyfold increase in spectrotemporal resolution. EFR amplitudes between dynamic AM stimuli and traditional discrete AM tokens within the same subjects were highly correlated (94% variance explained) across species. Hence, we establish a time-efficient and spectrally specific approach to measure EFRs. These results could yield novel clinical diagnostics for precision audiology approaches by enabling rapid, objective assessment of temporal processing along the entire auditory neuraxis.

Identifiers

PMID38352339
PMCPMC10862703
OpenAlexW4391301389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.