Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352307›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Distinguishing different psychiatric disorders using DDx-PRS.

Wouter J Peyrot, Georgia Panagiotaropoulou, Loes M Olde Loohuis, Mark J Adams, Swapnil Awasthi, Tian Ge, Andrew M McIntosh, Brittany L Mitchell, Niamh Mullins, Kevin S O'Connell and 12 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wouter J Peyrot
Georgia Panagiotaropoulou
Loes M Olde Loohuis
Mark J Adams
Swapnil Awasthi
Tian Ge
Andrew M McIntoshORCID 0000-0002-0198-4588
Brittany L Mitchell
Niamh Mullins
Kevin S O'Connell
Brenda W J H Penninx
Danielle Posthuma
Douglas M Ruderfer
Emil Uffelmann
Bjarni J Vilhjalmsson
Zhihong Zhu
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Jordan W Smoller
Alkes L Price

Funding

Statistical methods to localize disease heritability and identify biological mechanismsR37MH107649 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Benjamin Michael Neale · 2019 to 2026
$7.0M
Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG006399 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PRICE, ALKES L · 2011 to 2024
$6.3M
5/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124873 · NIMH · CARDIFF UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CATHRYN, O'DONOVAN, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006399NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124873NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH107649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great progress on methods for case-control polygenic prediction (e.g. schizophrenia vs. control), there remains an unmet need for a method that genetically distinguishes clinically related disorders (e.g. schizophrenia (SCZ) vs. bipolar disorder (BIP) vs. depression (MDD) vs. control); such a method could have important clinical value, especially at disorder onset when differential diagnosis can be challenging. Here, we introduce a method, Differential Diagnosis-Polygenic Risk Score (DDx-PRS), that jointly estimates posterior probabilities of each possible diagnostic category (e.g. SCZ=50%, BIP=25%, MDD=15%, control=10%) by modeling variance/covariance structure across disorders, leveraging case-control polygenic risk scores (PRS) for each disorder (computed using existing methods) and prior clinical probabilities for each diagnostic category. DDx-PRS uses only summary-level training data and does not use tuning data, facilitating implementation in clinical settings. In simulations, DDx-PRS was well-calibrated (whereas a simpler approach that analyzes each disorder marginally was poorly calibrated), and effective in distinguishing each diagnostic category vs. the rest. We then applied DDx-PRS to Psychiatric Genomics Consortium SCZ/BIP/MDD/control data, including summary-level training data from 3 case-control GWAS (

Identifiers

PMID38352307
PMCPMC10862992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.