Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352187›Full record

ArticleBJR open2024

Factors influencing the reliability of a CT angiography-based deep learning method for infarct volume estimation.

Lasse Hokkinen, Teemu Mäkelä, Sauli Savolainen, Marko Kangasniemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lasse HokkinenRadiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00290, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6084-9100
Teemu MäkeläRadiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00290, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-5283
Sauli SavolainenRadiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00290, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-322X
Marko KangasniemiRadiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00290, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: CT angiography (CTA)-based machine learning methods for infarct volume estimation have shown a tendency to overestimate infarct core and final infarct volumes (FIV). Our aim was to assess factors influencing the reliability of these methods. Methods: The effect of collateral circulation on the correlation between convolutional neural network (CNN) estimations and FIV was assessed based on the Miteff system and hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) in 121 patients with anterior circulation acute ischaemic stroke using Pearson correlation coefficients and median volumes. Correlation was also assessed between successful and futile thrombectomies. The timing of individual CTAs in relation to CTP studies was analysed. Results: The strength of correlation between CNN estimated volumes and FIV did not change significantly depending on collateral status as assessed with the Miteff system or HIR, being poor to moderate ( Conclusions: This study showed no effect of collateral status on the reliability of the CNN and best correlation was found in patients with futile thrombectomies. CTA timing in the mid arterial phase in virtually all patients can explain infarct volume overestimation. Advances in knowledge: CTA timing seems to be the most important factor influencing the reliability of current CTA-based machine learning methods, emphasizing the need for CTA protocol optimization for infarct core estimation.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographymachine learningneuroradiologystroke

Identifiers

PMID38352187
PMCPMC10860582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.