Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352182›Full record

ReviewBJR open2024

Commercially available artificial intelligence tools for fracture detection: the evidence.

Cato Pauling, Baris Kanber, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cato PaulingUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Baris KanberQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, University College London (UCL) Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-8800
Owen J ArthursUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-3516
Susan C ShelmerdineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-9967

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R002118/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missed fractures are a costly healthcare issue, not only negatively impacting patient lives, leading to potential long-term disability and time off work, but also responsible for high medicolegal disbursements that could otherwise be used to improve other healthcare services. When fractures are overlooked in children, they are particularly concerning as opportunities for safeguarding may be missed. Assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) in interpreting medical images may offer a possible solution for improving patient care, and several commercial AI tools are now available for radiology workflow implementation. However, information regarding their development, evidence for performance and validation as well as the intended target population is not always clear, but vital when evaluating a potential AI solution for implementation. In this article, we review the range of available products utilizing AI for fracture detection (in both adults and children) and summarize the evidence, or lack thereof, behind their performance. This will allow others to make better informed decisions when deciding which product to procure for their specific clinical requirements.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecommercialfractureimagingmachine learningradiology

Identifiers

PMID38352182
PMCPMC10860511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.