Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352111›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Impact and Implications of Regenerative Medicine in Urology.

Abdullah I Abuharb, Abdullah F Alzarroug, Saad N Algahtani, Hatan K Alghamdi, Fahad A Alosaimi, Nasser Alsuwayna, Alwaleed I Almughira

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current Progress of Tissue Engineering With Stem Cells in Urology Updated Review in 2025.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdullah I AbuharbCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah F AlzarrougCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Saad N AlgahtaniCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Hatan K AlghamdiCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Fahad A AlosaimiCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nasser AlsuwaynaCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Alwaleed I AlmughiraCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Islamic University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urology focuses on the treatment of genitourinary disorders through therapies ranging from lifestyle changes to advanced surgeries; the field has recently incorporated robotic and minimally invasive technologies that have improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital stays and complications. However, these methods still have certain limitations. Regenerative medicine, focusing on natural repair abilities, can be an effective and safer alternative. This review aims to examine the impact of regenerative medicine in urology. We adopted a systematic review design by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An exhaustive online literature search involving the databases PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar was conducted spanning the period between January 2010 and October 2023. Data were extracted from studies on regenerative medicine in urology with a special focus on efficacy and safety. Data from 16 studies were analyzed, which showed that cell therapy, biological materials, and tissue engineering are generally used in the field of urinary diseases. The main applications include the regeneration of urinary tissue, the correction of urinary incontinence, the treatment of erectile dysfunction, the reconstruction of ureteric defects, and the formation of bladder tissue. The study findings generally lack definitive conclusions on effectiveness and safety. While our results indicate that regenerative medicine is successful on a subjective level, more clinical trials are needed to establish its effectiveness and safety.

Indexed as

efficacygenitourinary surgery.regenerative medicinesafetyurology

Identifiers

PMID38352111
PMCPMC10863929
OpenAlexW4390858363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.