Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352080›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Autonomous Robotic Surgery: Has the Future Arrived?

Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Miguel Rodriguez, Paola Losada-Muñoz, Samantha Redden, Saiddys Lopez-Lezama, Andrea Vidal-Gallardo, Debbye Machado-Paled, Jesus Cordova Guilarte, Sheyla Teran-Quintero

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
22.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Developing a Typology of Women's Attitudes Towards AI Use in the BreastScreen Programme-A Qualitative Study With BreastScreen Victoria Clients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. MUTUAL: Towards Holistic Sensing and Inference in the Operating Room.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2025
    Article
  16. The Frontiers of Smart Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Yeisson Rivero-MorenoDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Oriente, Barcelona, VEN.
Miguel RodriguezDepartment of Surgery, Mercury Clinical Research, Houston, USA.
Paola Losada-MuñozDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Oriente, Barcelona, VEN.
Samantha ReddenDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Saiddys Lopez-LezamaDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Oriente, Barcelona, VEN.
Andrea Vidal-GallardoDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de los Andes, Merida, VEN.
Debbye Machado-PaledDepartment of Surgery, Universidad Católica de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, HND.
Jesus Cordova GuilarteDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Oriente, Barcelona, VEN.
Sheyla Teran-QuinteroDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, VEN.
Universidad de Oriente · VEUniversidad de Oriente · SVBaylor College of Medicine · USMercy Hospital · USUniversidad Católica de Honduras Nuestra Señora Reina de la Paz · HNUniversity of Carabobo · VEUniversity of the Andes · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autonomous robotic surgery represents a pioneering field dedicated to the integration of robotic systems with varying degrees of autonomy for the execution of surgical procedures. This paradigm shift is made possible by the progressive integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into the realm of surgical interventions. While the majority of autonomous robotic systems remain in the experimental phase, a notable subset has successfully transitioned into clinical applications. Noteworthy procedures, such as venipuncture, hair implantations, intestinal anastomosis, total knee replacement, cochlear implant, radiosurgery, and knot tying, among others, exemplify the current capabilities of autonomous surgical systems. This review endeavors to comprehensively address facets of autonomous robotic surgery, commencing with a concise elucidation of fundamental concepts and traversing the pivotal milestones in the historical evolution of robotic surgery. This historical trajectory underscores the incremental assimilation of autonomous systems into surgical practices. This review aims to address topics related to autonomous robotic surgery, starting with a description of fundamental concepts and going through the milestones in robotic surgery history that also show the gradual incorporations of autonomous systems. It also includes a discussion of the key benefits and risks of this technology, the degrees of autonomy in surgical robots, their limitations, the current legal regulations governing their usage, and the main ethical concerns inherent to their nature.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautonomous robotic surgeryclinical applicationsdegrees of autonomyethical concernslegal regulationsrobotic surgery milestones

Identifiers

PMID38352080
PMCPMC10862530
OpenAlexW4390859440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.