ArticleBMJ neurology open2024
Inflammatory markers and functional outcome score in different subgroups of ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunotherapies for Ischemic Stroke Patients: Current Status and Future Directions.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hospitalization and post-discharge expenses of stroke in Iran: A retrospective cohort study.Current journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Association between the systemic inflammatory response index and acute ischemic stroke in young people.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Determining subgroups and outcomes of AIS may lead to better treatment. We aimed to investigate the relationship between inflammatory markers and subgroups of AIS with further follow-up of patients in terms of functional outcome score. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we examined white cell count (WCC), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and qualitative C reactive protein (CRP), in the first 24 hours of patients' admission. Patients were assigned to AIS subgroups as defined by the TOAST criteria. Then patients' disability score was followed up after 3 and 6 months, using the modified Rankin Scale. Results: We included 217 patients with AIS. The mean age of participants was 72.07 years, and we included 92 women (42.4%). For the AIS subgroup, 83 (38.25%) patients had large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), 41 (18.89%) had cardioembolism and 62 (28.57) had small vessel obstruction. Neutrophil count and NLR showed a statistically significant difference in the subgroups of AIS and were highest in the 'other' subgroup of AIS (p<0.05). Lymphocyte count, ESR and qualitative CRP showed no statistically significant difference between subgroups (p>0.05). WCC, neutrophil count and NLR showed a positive correlation with functional outcomes (p<0.05), other markers did not correlate with outcomes (pp>0.05). Conclusion: We can conclude that neutrophil count and NLR are available inflammatory biomarkers for predicting outcomes and these two biomarkers are associated with AIS subgroups. However, ESR, qualitative CRP and lymphocyte count do not appear to be correlated with outcomes or subgroup of AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.