Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352039›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Fecal and vaginal microbiota of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pregnant elk challenged with

Bienvenido W Tibbs-Cortes, Faith M Rahic-Seggerman, Stephan Schmitz-Esser, Paola M Boggiatto, Steven Olsen, Ellie J Putz

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bienvenido W Tibbs-Cortes *Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, United States.
Faith M Rahic-Seggerman *Interdepartmental Microbiology Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Stephan Schmitz-Esser *Interdepartmental Microbiology Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Paola M Boggiatto *Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, United States.
Steven Olsen *Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, United States.
Ellie J Putz *Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, United States.
United States Department of Agriculture · USIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: We analyzed the fecal and vaginal microbial communities of Results: We observed that the elk fecal and vaginal microbiota are similar to those of other ruminants, and these microbial communities were affected both by time of sampling and by vaccination status. Notably, we observed that taxa representing ruminant reproductive tract pathogens tended to increase in abundance in the elk vaginal microbiome following parturition. Furthermore, many of these taxa differed significantly in abundance depending on vaccination status, indicating that vaccination against Discussion: This study is the first to analyze the vaginal microbiota of any species of the genus

Indexed as

brucellosiselkfecalmicrobiomepregnancyRB51vaginal

Identifiers

PMID38352039
PMCPMC10861794
OpenAlexW4391358729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.