ArticleJTCVS techniques2024
A novel technique of voice-sparing cricotracheal resection.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cricotracheal resection (CTR) is considered the standard of care for patients suffering from idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Although CTR results in permanent restoration of airway patency, it has a mild to moderate impact on voice quality. Here we propose modifications of the standard CTR technique to make it a voice-preserving procedure. Methods: Five women with iSGS underwent voice-sparing CTR between January 2022 and January 2023. In this procedure, through several technical adaptations, the function of the cricothyroid joint was preserved. Outcomes of these voice-sparing CTRs were compared to outcomes in patients who underwent standard CTR in our institution. All patients underwent full functional preoperative and postoperative workups, including spirometry, voice measurements, patient self-assessment, and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Results: All 5 patients in the study group suffered from iSGS with high-grade Myer-Cotton III° stenosis (100%); 1 patient had previously undergone endoscopic laser resection. Voice evaluation demonstrated a nearly unchanged fundamental pitch (mean preoperative, 191 ± 73.1 Hz; postoperative, 182 ± 64.2 Hz) and dynamic voice range (preoperative, 24.4 semitones; postoperative, 20.4 semitones). This was in contrast to the control group, in which significantly reduced voice quality was observed. Conclusions: In selected patients suffering from iSGS, excellent functional results can be obtained with voice-sparing CTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.