Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38352010›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2024

Predicting pressure gradient using artificial intelligence for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Anoushka Dasi, Beom Lee, Venkateshwar Polsani, Pradeep Yadav, Lakshmi Prasad Dasi, Vinod H Thourani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anoushka DasiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Beom LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
Venkateshwar PolsaniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Ga.
Pradeep YadavDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Ga.
Lakshmi Prasad DasiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
Vinod H ThouraniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Ga.
Piedmont Atlanta Hospital · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: After transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient indicates the effectiveness of the therapy. The objective is to develop artificial intelligence to predict the post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement aortic valve pressure gradient and aortic valve area from preprocedural echocardiography and computed tomography data. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement due to aortic valve stenosis. A total of 1091 patients were analyzed for pressure gradient predictions (mean age 76.8 ± 9.2 years, 57.8% male), and 1063 patients were analyzed for aortic valve area predictions (mean age 76.7 ± 9.3 years, 57.2% male). An artificial intelligence learning model was trained (training: n = 663 patients, validation: n = 206 patients) and tested (testing: n = 222 patients) to predict pressure gradient, and a separate artificial intelligence learning model was trained (training: n = 640 patients, validation: n = 218 patients) and tested (testing: n = 205 patients) for predicting aortic valve area. Results: The mean absolute error for pressure gradient and aortic valve area predictions was 3.0 mm Hg and 0.45 cm Conclusions: The artificial intelligence-based algorithm has demonstrated potential in predicting post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement transvalvular pressure gradient predictions for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Further studies are necessary to differentiate pressure gradient between valve types.

Indexed as

AIaortic stenosisaortic valveTAVR

Identifiers

PMID38352010
PMCPMC10859647
OpenAlexW4389166529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.