ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Sponge city construction and population health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This paper focuses on the construction of sponge cities and their effects on population health. Sponge cities in China both solve stormwater problems and are a systemic transformation in the urban construction paradigm, addressing related issues arising from high-speed urbanization. Whether sponge city construction in China can promote population health has received scant attention. Most previous studies have focused on urban environments and population health, with few exploring the potential effects on population health caused by urban environment changes due to urban policies. This study hypothesizes that sponge city construction improves the urban environment, and thus, population health. Methods: Using panel data from 119 prefecture-level cities between 2011 and 2019 and the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS), based on China's sponge city pilot policy, a quasi-natural experiment is conducted using Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to identify the health effects of the sponge city policy. Results: The findings show that sponge city pilot policy not only reduced ecological environment pollution and promoted the quality of built environment, but also significantly improved population health by 10.4%. This mechanism is mainly due to the restorative effects of the built environment. Discussion: The health effects vary across city administrative levels, and especially among non-older adults and local populations. Compared with the cities at higher administrative level, the health effect in lower administrative level is significantly positive, indicating that there is a diminishing marginal effect of sponge city construction. This study extends the causal identification chain of the impact of urban environment on population health to urban policies and provide insights into policy objectives for sponge city construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.