Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351903›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2024

Bypassing the build-up phase for oral immunotherapy in shrimp-allergic children.

Ann-Marie M Schoos, Edmond S Chan, Tiffany Wong, Stephanie C Erdle, Alanna Chomyn, Lianne Soller, Raymond Mak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann-Marie M SchoosCOPSAC, Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edmond S ChanDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tiffany WongDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stephanie C ErdleDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alanna ChomynDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lianne SollerDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Raymond MakDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for food allergies; however, its use in clinical practice is limited by resources and lack of standardized protocols for foods other than peanut. Previous studies have suggested that shrimp has a higher threshold for reaction than other allergenic foods, suggesting it may be safe to directly administer maintenance doses of immunotherapy. Methods: Children aged 3-17 years who had 1) skin prick test ≥3 mm and/or specific IgE level ≥0.35 kU/L and convincing objective IgE-mediated reaction to shrimp, or 2) no ingestion history and specific IgE level ≥5 kU/L, underwent a low-dose oral food challenge to 300 mg shrimp protein, with the goal of continuing daily ingestion of the 300 mg maintenance dose as oral immunotherapy. Results: Between January 2020 and April 2023, 17 children completed the low-dose oral food challenge. Nine (53%) tolerated this amount with no reaction, and 8 (47%) had a mild reaction (isolated oral pruritis or redness on chin). Sixteen (94%) continued maintenance low-dose oral immunotherapy eating 300 mg shrimp protein daily. None of the patients developed anaphylaxis related to the immunotherapy. Conclusion: Our case series suggests that some shrimp allergic patients being considered for oral immunotherapy should be offered a low-dose oral food challenge, to potentially bypass the build-up phase of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Build-up phaseChildrenEliciting doseFood allergyOral food challengeOral immunotherapyShrimp

Identifiers

PMID38351903
PMCPMC10862060
OpenAlexW4391508404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.