ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
Multi-omics Combined with Machine Learning Facilitating the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric bacterial microbiota and gastric carcinogenesis: from dysbiosis to immune remodeling and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and clinical application of a postoperative complication prognosis prediction model for gastric cancer patients based on automated machine learning with body fat rate.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Gastric Cancer and Microbiota: Exploring the Microbiome's Role in Carcinogenesis and Treatment Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Beyond Biomarkers: Machine Learning-Driven Multiomics for Personalized Medicine in Gastric Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Identifying Aberrant 1CM-Related Pathways by Multi-Omics Analysis and Validating Tumor Inhibitory Effect of One-Carbon Donor Betaine in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Potential biomarkers in early detection of gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- MASE-GC: a multi-omics autoencoder and stacking ensemble framework for gastric cancer classification.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly intricate gastrointestinal malignancy. Early detection of gastric cancer forms the cornerstone of precision medicine. Several studies have been conducted to investigate early biomarkers of gastric cancer using genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, respectively. However, endogenous substances associated with various omics are concurrently altered during gastric cancer development. Furthermore, environmental exposures and family history can also induce modifications in endogenous substances. Therefore, in this study, we primarily investigated alterations in DNA mutation, DNA methylation, mRNA, lncRNA, miRNA, circRNA, and protein, as well as glucose, amino acid, nucleotide, and lipid metabolism levels in the context of GC development, employing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Additionally, we elucidate the impact of exposure factors, including HP, EBV, nitrosamines, smoking, alcohol consumption, and family history, on diagnostic biomarkers of gastric cancer. Lastly, we provide a summary of the application of machine learning in integrating multi-omics data. Thus, this review aims to elucidate: i) the biomarkers of gastric cancer related to genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics; ii) the influence of environmental exposure and family history on multiomics data; iii) the integrated analysis of multi-omics data using machine learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.