Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351603›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2024

Beyond multiple choice: Clinical simulation as a rigorous and inclusive method for assessing genetic counseling competencies.

Megan T Cho, Claire Davis, Chenery Lowe, Maureen Flynn, Leila Jamal, Komal Bajaj, Carrie Atzinger, Lori H Erby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Megan T ChoCenter for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9301-605X
Claire DavisJoan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, New York, USA.
Chenery LoweHealth, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Maureen FlynnDepartment of Genetic Counseling, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leila JamalHealth, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Komal BajajOffice of Quality & Safety, NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi/North Central Bronx, New York, New York, USA.
Carrie AtzingerDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati & Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lori H ErbyCenter for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

NHGRI/DIR Genetic Counseling Training ProgramZIEHG200353 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ERBY, LORI · 2010 to 2025
$16.9M
Clinical Cancer Genomics ProgramZIDBC011908 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CALZONE, KATHLEEN · 2019 to 2025
$9.3M
The Stanford Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG008953 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mildred K. Cho, Meghan Halley · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG008953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational use of clinical simulation is a way for students to immerse themselves within a realistic yet safe and structured environment as they practice clinical skills. It is widely used in healthcare training and evaluation, and there are best practices for design, implementation, debriefing, and assessment. An increasing number of genetic counseling graduate programs use simulation in various ways, ranging from role-plays to working with professional simulated/standardized patient (SP) actors. At this time, there is very little consistency across programs, research on the approaches, and standards by which simulation is incorporated into training. Simulation is an understudied but promising approach for genetic counselor (GC) education and assessment. After graduation, GCs demonstrate their competence as entry-level providers through American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC) multiple-choice examination (MCE), along with their participatory clinical encounters from graduate training. Data from genetic counseling and other professions highlight the limitations and biases of MCEs, suggesting they not only fail to accurately capture competency, but also that they disadvantage underrepresented individuals from entering the field. In addition, MCEs are limited as a tool for assessing nuanced counseling and communication skills, as compared to more quantitative scientific knowledge. We propose that innovative, evidence-based approaches such as simulation have the potential to not only enhance learning, but also to allow GCs to better demonstrate competency during training and in relation to the board examination. Collaborative approaches, research, and funding are needed to further explore the viability of routinely incorporating simulation into GC training and assessment.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingEducational StatusHumansLearningStudentscounseling techniquesdiversityeducationgenetic counselingsimulationstandardized patients

Identifiers

PMID38351603
PMCPMC10922725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.