Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351408›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Predicting residual cholesteatoma with the Potsic staging system still lacks evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Klára Borbála Körmendy, Kinga Shenker-Horváth, Alexander Shulze Wenning, Péter Fehérvári, Andrea Harnos, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Molnár, Kata Illés, Tamás Horváth

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Staging of middle ear cholesteatoma surgery and its value for clinical decision-making].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Klára Borbála KörmendyCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1534-2201
Kinga Shenker-HorváthCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Alexander Shulze WenningCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Péter FehérváriCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Andrea HarnosCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Kata IllésCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-060X
Tamás HorváthCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary. horvath.tamas@bajcsy.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-8628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the rate of residual disease in the Potsic staging system for congenital cholesteatomas.

methodsA protocol registration was published on PROSPERO (CRD42022383932), describing residual disease as a primary outcome and hearing improvement as secondary. A systematic search was performed in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) on December 14, 2022. Articles were included if cholesteatomas were staged according to the Potsic system and follow-up duration was documented. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. In the statistical synthesis a random effects model was used. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using I

resultsThirteen articles were found to be eligible for systematic review and seven were included in the meta-analysis section. All records were retrospective cohort studies with high risk of bias. Regarding the proportions of residual disease, analysis using the χ

conclusionNo statistically significant difference was found in the proportions of residual disease between Potsic stages, thus the staging system's applicability for outcome prediction could not be proven based on the available data. Targeted studies are needed for a higher level of evidence.

Indexed as

Cholesteatoma, Middle EarCholesteatomaHumansPrognosisCongenital cholesteatomaPotsicResidual cholesteatoma

Identifiers

PMID38351408
PMCPMC11211107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.