Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351298›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Karol Martínez-Palacios, Sebastián Vásquez-García, Olubunmi A Fariyike, Chiara Robba, Andrés M Rubiano, noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06772155 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Effectiveness Study on Catheter Locking Device Versus Standard Ventriculostomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMeditech FoundationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled292ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injuries, Intracranial HypertensionArmsVentriculostomy, Ventriculostomy + Locking Device
NCT06776614 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative-effectiveness Study on Expansion Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Intracranial Compartment Syndrome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMeditech FoundationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled292ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injuries, Intracranial HypertensionArmsDecompressive Craniectomy, Expansion Craniotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Update on traumatic brain injury in the ICU.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Invasive and non-invasive monitoring in the ICU.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karol Martínez-PalaciosNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-4761
Sebastián Vásquez-GarcíaFundación para la Educación e Investigación Médica y Técnica en Emergencias "MEDITECH", Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-1763
Olubunmi A FariyikeFundación para la Educación e Investigación Médica y Técnica en Emergencias "MEDITECH", Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9626-3144
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-3845
Andrés M RubianoNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia. andresrubiano@aol.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-3254
noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring international consensus group
Universidad El Bosque · COOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPalo Alto University · USUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureCritical CareHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurophysiological MonitoringPupilReflex, PupillaryIntracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressure (ICP)Invasive monitoringMonitoringNoninvasive monitoringPupillometerQuantitative pupillometryTraumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID38351298
PMCPMC11335905
OpenAlexW4391771303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.