ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Hepatic and pancreatic extracellular volume fraction analysis using contrast-enhanced CT in patients with diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pancreatic extracellular volume fraction based on dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps: association with diabetes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Multi-omics approaches for biomarker discovery and precision diagnosis of prediabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLiver and pancreatic fibrosis is associated with diabetes mellitus (DM), and liver fibrosis is associated with pancreatic fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the hepatic and pancreatic extracellular volume fractions (fECVs), which correlate with tissue fibrosis, and their relationships with DM and pre-DM (pDM). MATERIAL AND
methodsWe included 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected liver and/or pancreatic diseases who underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Patients were classified as nondiabetes, pDM, and DM with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of < 5.7%, 5.7%-6.5%, and ≥ 6.5% or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of < 100, 100-125 mg/dL, and ≥ 126 mg/dL, respectively. Subtraction images between unenhanced and equilibrium-phase images were prepared. The liver and the pancreas were automatically extracted using a high-speed, three-dimensional image analysis system, and their respective mean CT values were calculated. The enhancement degree of the aorta (Δaorta) was measured. fECV was calculated using the following equation: fECV = (100 - hematocrit) * Δliver or pancreas/Δaorta. Differences were investigated in hepatic and pancreatic fECVs among the three groups, and the correlation between each two in hepatic fECV, pancreatic fECV, and HbA1c was determined.
resultsThe pancreatic fECV, which was positively correlated with the hepatic fECV and HbA1c (r = 0.51, P < 0.001, and r = 0.51, P < 0.001, respectively), significantly differed among the three groups (P < 0.001) and was significantly greater in DM than in pDM or nondiabetes and in pDM with nondiabetes (P < 0.001). Hepatic fECV was significantly greater in DM than in nondiabetes (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe pancreatic fECV and pDM/DM are closely related.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.